Thread: Chocolate gel?
View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old January 30th, 2008, 01:35 AM
phil000's Avatar
phil000 phil000 is offline
CB Supporter 

Techie
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Cincy and Kent, opposites of ohio
Posts: 97
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to phil000
Default Re: Chocolate gel?

Quote:
Originally Posted by derekleffew View Post
Many of you have in the past expressed a liking for R99, L156, or AP7100, (can't find the GAM#). Could you please explain to me why? Skeptically, I tried it once in college, and confirmed my suspicions. All it did was dim the light, and guess what they were already on a dimmer that I could control; and warm-up the light, and that happened also due to amber-drift as I ran the dimmer down. If I want a warm source but still keep the intensity, L151, L152, L153, L154, and L162 and L176, or R01-R04 have always done everything I needed them to.
If I wanted to dim a light and warm it up, R03 (Dark BA)+L210 (0.6ND) comes pretty close to R99, but I've never needed or wanted that. So please help me to understand some of you people's love of chocolate.
Maybe I don't get it because I was taught there's no such thing as "tan, brown, or gray" light. And I've never had anyone ask me to mix any of those from a CYM source either.

I'm with you on this one derek, I really dislike it. it's just bleh, I used it once, and once was more than enough.
Reply With Quote