View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old July 22nd, 2008, 06:39 PM
Eboy87's Avatar
Eboy87 Eboy87 is offline

Technical Director
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: St. Louis, MO (Chicago for college)
Posts: 952
Thanks: 2
Thanked 21 Times in 21 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Eboy87
Default Re: Wireless vs Redundant

To echo the above statments (I'm good at that), a wired connection is much more reliable. I used to have a wireless rig for my guitar, but I had too many dropouts and switched back to wired. Personally, I'm starting to build all my cables myself. A) it's cheaper (as far as I'm concerned), and B) quality control begins and ends with me.

Definitly invest in a good cable tester, it'll solve many headaches down the line. The Qbox is a good one, but I'm waiting to purchase a rat sniffer/sender (which probably won't help you much because it's geared more towards XLR) linky.

I'd say to nix the wireless and redundant cable and invest/build quality 1/4" cable. THe problem you're running into, as wayne hoskins said, is that most instrument cables that musos use are poor quality, coupled with the fact that they're abused night after night, and they become the weak link in that signal chain. I've rarely had failures after the DI (once or twice, but those were from bad snake channels), but have plenty of stories of musos' cables crapping out on them. Just watch it lending out cables, rarely do the lent ones come back.
__________________
Ian Garrett
Columbia College Chicago Theatre Department

"The clarinet always plays out of tune because it's so out of tune with the universe." - Dan Meade

Last edited by derekleffew; July 22nd, 2008 at 06:44 PM..
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links