View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old July 24th, 2008, 11:07 AM
JD's Avatar
JD JD is offline

Technical Director
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 692
Thanks: 6
Thanked 34 Times in 31 Posts
Default Re: Magnetic vs. Electronic Ballasts/power supplies

Quote:
Originally Posted by Radiant View Post
Forgive my ignorance, but what are the major benefits and liabilities of each design? More to the heart of the matter, what does the ballast do?
Ballasts are needed to regulate the current flow through the arc tube of discharge lights. In most cases, ballasts also provide the high voltage spike needed to ignite these lights as well.

Fast Overview:
Magnetic Ballast:
1) Large transformer-like core, power factoring capacitor, and a Igniter that produces a high voltage kick to get the light going.
2) Lamp actually "blinks" 120 times per second each time the voltage crosses 0 volts
3) Limited range of voltage and frequency input before unit can not provide the correct conditions to keep the lamp lit.
4) Very heavy
5) Simple design, so there is not much to fail. Been around for 60+ years, in almost every street light out there.

Electronic Ballast:
1) Converts AC to DC and then back to AC at a very high frequency using solid state components.
2) Fully regulated circuit can take very wide range of voltages and frequencies while maintaining proper lamp conditions.
3) Due to the high frequency, there is no visible lamp flicker.
4) Due to secondary frequency, the transformer core can be very small and lightweight.
5) Complicated design which "came of age" after high voltage transistors became available. (about 20 years)
6) Usually very reliable, but part failure will stop unit dead.
__________________
John Dziel
DAE Concert Lighting
founded 1971
Intelligent Lighting Solutions
"Oh, that switch also fed the Hotel ?"
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JD For This Useful Post:
lieperjp (July 24th, 2008), Radiant (July 24th, 2008)