Highlighting glossary terms un-intentionally

[derekleffew]

I pretty sure this has been mentioned before.

See this post. "ul" is highlighted and click-able in "regularly" and "careful", but not in "UL label", where it should be. I've also seen words like particular, and you know, etc. Should we put periods between/after all acronyms in the glossary?

[Grog12]

Well P.A.R. has periods in it because I got sick of it being PARt and PARking space.

[avkid]

We've been at this since the beginning of the glossary.
-
I think the prevailing opinion is to just "let it be".

[derekleffew]

With the recent addition of the term "At" to the glossary,

Originally Posted by rochem

Is there a way to make this so it doesn't appear automatically in everyone's posts? It's kind of annoying to see words like That and Beat having the "at" portion highlighted. The word at is pretty self-explanatory, and if we ever did need to provide the definition of it, we could just link to it manually. Thoughts?

Originally Posted by derekleffew

The problem has been noted before, (see http://www.controlbooth.com/forums/b...ntionally.html). As a possible solution, I've enclosed the term in double quotes. We'll see what, if any, effect this has.

Adding the double quotes appears to have broken the glossary (only terms beginning with numberals are being displayed, so the term is being deleted.

Just in case, "@" is being deleted also.