Go Back   ControlBooth > CB Discussions > Lighting
 
    Advanced Search

Notices

Lighting For any discussions related to lighting


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old July 1st, 2009, 01:19 PM

 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 9
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Hog Vs. Vista

Hello all, been a day or so. I am looking at doing some new installs at the church I work at, and am looking at installing some new fixtures, including some MAC 2000's profile, and possibly utilizing our existing MAC 600's, Im pretty set on the fixtures although wouldn't mind some feedback on the 2000 fixtures, or if there is a better light for the money right now. What I really want to know is some opinions on using a Hog VS Vista systems, pro's/con's. Let me know what you guys think, and I can answer any relevent questions to my situation that you might need to properly answer my question. Thanks.
Reply With Quote
Old July 1st, 2009, 01:50 PM

 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 899
Thanks: 0
Thanked 20 Times in 20 Posts
Send a message via AIM to TimMiller
Default Re: Hog Vs. Vista

The Hog and Vista are both great consoles. the style of programming on both of them are totally different. In the hog you work in a cue list like any other lighting console, in the Vista you work in a time line like you are editing video. When it comes to dance shows i love the vista, you can drop in all of your music, lay it out the time line for the music, then build your lighting timeline right next to it, makes life much easier. When it comes to theatrical lighting I like the hog, but dont mind the vista. The vista is a little clunky when it comes to dealing with large attributes, but i think the new software has been released or about to be released, which is an entrie rewrite of the software to address all of these issues. Also what vista and hog models are you looking at? Also I do not like the MAC2000's. They are kinda loud, and even when DMX is off, their fans are always running. Every tech i have talked to who works on mac 2000's say that if you lose a piece of glass in the color mixing module the whole color mixing system self distructs. The color mixing system in the MAC 2000 is made out of very thin glass, and it is shoved right up next to the lamp. Personally i like the ROBE 1200. I did a shoot out a while back, and the ROBE kicked the MAC2000's butt badly. In the ROBE the zoom is better, gobos are better, if i remember speed was about the same, I like the colors in the ROBE better, they were more concentrated.
Reply With Quote
Old July 1st, 2009, 10:18 PM

 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Hog Vs. Vista

See, Not having use the Robe 1200 like Tim has suggested above I'm not qualified to comment. I lean towards the Hog as my theatrical choice for musical theatre and it's good because it makes it easy to program position groups and have template for your venue which you can alter for whatever show you have. I've been VL ing for the last couple and we use Mac2K profiles a fair bit in the shows. Though I just did a gig with Robe 3000 DLP's....possibly the best thing ever.
Reply With Quote
Old July 1st, 2009, 11:54 PM

 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Woodstock, GA
Posts: 78
Thanks: 6
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Hog Vs. Vista

My church did a shoot out between the Mac 2K and the VL 3500. VL won hands down. We also are using a Vista which gives us the ability to create per song similar to what Tim said with his dance concerts. Basically we program per song and then gang them together to form our service. Has worked great for the past year and it makes it perfect for pulling past songs back up which saves on programing time.
__________________
David Long
Lighting Designer @ First Baptist Church Woodstock, GA
Reply With Quote
Old July 2nd, 2009, 01:40 AM
Grog12's Avatar
CBmod
 Premium Member 
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,712
Thanks: 13
Thanked 29 Times in 28 Posts
Blog Entries: 3
Default Re: Hog Vs. Vista

Quote:
Originally Posted by theatre4jc View Post
My church did a shoot out between the Mac 2K and the VL 3500. VL won hands down. We also are using a Vista which gives us the ability to create per song similar to what Tim said with his dance concerts. Basically we program per song and then gang them together to form our service. Has worked great for the past year and it makes it perfect for pulling past songs back up which saves on programing time.
You can do the same on a Hogg, MA or even Vector.
__________________
6 P's to live by: Piss Poor Planning Prevents Positive Performance
4 P's for LD's Producers Prefer Pretty Photographs.
Nothing like being focused and desperate to make me remember how something works. ~Steve B
Reply With Quote
Old July 2nd, 2009, 06:59 AM

 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 899
Thanks: 0
Thanked 20 Times in 20 Posts
Send a message via AIM to TimMiller
Default Re: Hog Vs. Vista

Pretty much any good moving light console will let you merge cue lists together. In the hog you can store over 1000 cue lists and you can link cue lists to cue lists, to trigger other cue lists. I strongly suggest checking out the robe, and dont be afraid to call up vendors and ask them for a demo. Call Robe, Martin, and varilite and ask them all for a demo, set them all up side by side, fire them all up and see what you think. Personally i hate the framing system that is in the varilite. Clay pakys framing system is the best one made. Once clay paky decides to start selling to end users again, rather than being forced to go through a dealer (our dealers are crap, their markups are unreal) maybe i will consider buying more claypaky.
Reply With Quote
Old July 2nd, 2009, 10:58 AM
JChenault's Avatar
 Premium Member 

 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: seattle, wa USA
Posts: 161
Thanks: 7
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Default Re: Hog Vs. Vista

Quote:
Originally Posted by TimMiller View Post
Personally i hate the framing system that is in the varilite. Clay pakys framing system is the best one made.
Tim

I'm curious. What about the varilite model do you not like? I find it intuitive and simple to use ( at least on my console).

John Chenault
Reply With Quote
Old July 2nd, 2009, 02:45 PM

 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 899
Thanks: 0
Thanked 20 Times in 20 Posts
Send a message via AIM to TimMiller
Default Re: Hog Vs. Vista

VL3500 i dont like the framing system. Clay pakys framing system you can pull any shutter completely across the beam, varilights framing system is the same as the framing system in my pals, you can pull it almost half way, when you pull all the shutters in you get this great square of a light. Not being able to pull the shutters all the way in makes it limiting for those really weird shutter cuts. Also you can do some really cool reveals, by pulling the one shutter all the way in, then having it go out. Tell me can a VL3500 do this http://www.claypaky.it/video/alpha_p...ium%20320).zip
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
console, design, hog, lighting, vista

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
a vista icewolf08 Glossary T-Z 0 March 19th, 2009 11:10 PM
Jands Vista mrtrudeau23 Glossary F-L 0 February 10th, 2009 02:08 AM
Jands Vista T4 Jezza Lighting 2 May 28th, 2007 11:44 PM
JANDS Vista JP12687 Lighting 2 September 26th, 2004 09:29 AM


All times are UTC -4. The time now is 10:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.1 
Advertisement System V2.6 By   Branden

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80