+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 16 of 16
  1. #1
    gafftaper's Avatar
    gafftaper is online now Senior Team
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Seattle, Washington
    Occupation
    College T.D.
    Posts
    7,097
    Thanks
    49

    Default Degrading audio quality on purpose

    Hi all, we are using SFX for playback and Audacity for editing at the college. This is our fourth show with that combo. I know there are fancier products out there but I'm finding Audacity easy to work with without any real training. My students also like it. So I keep running into situations where I want to take a modern high quality digital recording and degrade it to sound more appropriate for the time period. I've been running a high pass and low pass filter in Audacity and that does a pretty good job but I would really like to be able to take it a step further and put a little bit of dirtiness and noise into it as well.

    Is there a feature of Audacity that I'm missing that will do this? Is there another program that will do this easily... without switching to an entirely different product? Are you yelling at the screen to tell me to not be so cheap and buy a better product than free Audacity that has lot's more effect features? Do it the old fashioned way by playing it through an old crappy speaker?

    Thanks for your thoughts!
    Community College Technical Director

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    New Ulm, Minnesota, United States
    Posts
    1,158
    Thanks
    45

    Default Re: Degrading audio quality on purpose

    Quote Originally Posted by gafftaper View Post
    Do it the old fashioned way by playing it through an old crappy speaker?
    That's what I do! It's so easy!
    Felicity: "We want the lights on when they're off - I mean not like when they're on, like now, but just not off so that they're not on."
    Mrs. Reese: "Felicity, I don't think a snowman would appreciate the subtleties of Stage Lighting, do you?"
    Felicity: "He might do..."

    From Farndale Ave... Presents A Christmas Carol

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Occupation
    Pro
    Posts
    1,138
    Thanks
    5

    Default Re: Degrading audio quality on purpose

    I did something like this in GarageBand for a friend's school project. He wanted an old 50's PSA film strip sounding voice over, so I just ran it through an amp simulator. I've never really gotten that deep into Audacity (I'm a ProTools kind of guy), but search around for something like that.
    Ian Garrett

    This is Winston Churchill speaking. If you have a microphone in my room, it is a waste of time. I do not talk in my sleep.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Northwest Ohio
    Occupation
    Manager/Administrator
    Posts
    135
    Thanks
    9

    Default Re: Degrading audio quality on purpose

    Not sure what effect you are going after. Try recording the sound of a record player at the end of the album. Use audacity to get rid of the needle skip for every revolution, and then loop it. Mix that track in with your re eq'd vocal and vuala. Again, don't know exactly what you're after. Just a brain storm.
    Hugh Saunier, Technical Director

    Niswonger PAC of NW Ohio
    10700 SR 118
    Van Wert, Ohio 45891

    [email protected]

    419-238-6722

    www.npacvw.org

  5. #5
    gafftaper's Avatar
    gafftaper is online now Senior Team
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Seattle, Washington
    Occupation
    College T.D.
    Posts
    7,097
    Thanks
    49

    Default Re: Degrading audio quality on purpose

    The problem is even with the high pass and low pass what remains is a high quality recording. I've been thinking about messing around with adding in a layer of static in the background as hsaunier has suggested but that still doesn't exactly change the fact that I've got a clean original signal.

    I think I saw an amp simulator plug in for Audacity. I'll give that a try too.

    Perhaps I should just go find myself a crappy old speaker.
    Community College Technical Director

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Centerville, Ohio
    Occupation
    High School Student
    Posts
    188
    Thanks
    6

    Default Re: Degrading audio quality on purpose

    I haven't found an easy way to do this in basic Audacity (no plugins) and I've been in this situation before. I've done what you mentioned about adding a layer of static in the background, I've had relative success with this approach, just choose your static wisely.
    Golden rule of Theatre: Anything an actor can trip over an actor will trip over.
    Mom... Dad... I'm a Thespian

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Marine City, MI
    Occupation
    Manager/Administrator
    Posts
    1,769
    Thanks
    3

    Default Re: Degrading audio quality on purpose

    Quote Originally Posted by ishboo View Post
    choose your static wisely.


    If I had a dime for every time I heard that...........

    ~Dave

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    New Ulm, Minnesota, United States
    Posts
    1,158
    Thanks
    45

    Default Re: Degrading audio quality on purpose

    Quote Originally Posted by gafftaper View Post
    The problem is even with the high pass and low pass what remains is a high quality recording. I've got a clean original signal.
    Perhaps change that. Use an older mic or older recorder to record the sound so as not to get the cleanest record possible?
    Felicity: "We want the lights on when they're off - I mean not like when they're on, like now, but just not off so that they're not on."
    Mrs. Reese: "Felicity, I don't think a snowman would appreciate the subtleties of Stage Lighting, do you?"
    Felicity: "He might do..."

    From Farndale Ave... Presents A Christmas Carol

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Chicago
    Occupation
    Freelance
    Posts
    23
    Thanks
    0

    Default Re: Degrading audio quality on purpose

    Quite a lot of it depends on what effect you're going for. Groove noise is a good thing to add if you want to make a record-player sound, but probably not if you're looking for a telephone. Think about what the characteristics of the technology you're trying to replicate actually are: limited frequency range? Tape hiss? Static? Groove noise? Turntable rumble? Tape compression? Radio station broadcast limiting? Small, underpowered speakers? Resonant EQ peaks?

    You can do an awful lot with EQ, not just high- and low-pass filters but boosting certain frequencies and cutting others (telephones will often have a boost somewhere around the resonant frequency of the human voice...funny how that works).

    Compression is also a great tool for "aging" a recording--certain compressors (and limiters) are less transparent than others and if you hit them hard they start to distort and filter the sound.

    Then, too, actual distortion is a great tool as well. The amp simulator idea above is a great suggestion, as is the suggestion to send the signal through another speaker and re-record it. In music mixing they call that "re-amping," and in film it's sometimes called "worldizing." Either way, run the signal through an overloaded amp into a cruddy speaker and you'll be well on your way. To something at least...
    Joe Griffin
    Sound designer
    toxicbag.com

    Current projects:
    in pre-production for "Macbeth" at Moraine Valley Comm. College, Palos Hills, IL

  10. #10
    gafftaper's Avatar
    gafftaper is online now Senior Team
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Seattle, Washington
    Occupation
    College T.D.
    Posts
    7,097
    Thanks
    49

    Default Re: Degrading audio quality on purpose

    Just to clarify, for those unclear of what I am trying to do. My current example is I've got a perfect crystal clear CD recording of an orchestra playing a song... which is supposed to be coming from a 1940's radio. So I need to degrade the quality enough to make it fit the time period. We are going to try adding a layer of static next ("choose your static wisely"). If that doesn't work, I'm off to Value Village to buy a crappy speaker. I'm thinking I might have good results running it all through a mid range driver and the possibility of poking a couple holes in it is in the back of my mind as well.
    Community College Technical Director

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Chicago
    Occupation
    Freelance
    Posts
    23
    Thanks
    0

    Default Re: Degrading audio quality on purpose

    Thanks for the specifics. For a '40s radio, that's a mono AM broadcast. I'd limit the bandwidth (at that period AM radio topped out at 5kHz, so roll off frequencies above that) and add some compression/limiting, and then try to use EQ to replicate the odd low-mid peak that AM broadcasts all seem to have. As far as static is concerned, I'd keep it kinda light and thin, and maybe fade it in and out so it isn't constant. The speaker idea is a good one, though you probably won't have to put holes in it.
    Last edited by JoeGriffin; February 23rd, 2009 at 04:20 PM.
    Joe Griffin
    Sound designer
    toxicbag.com

    Current projects:
    in pre-production for "Macbeth" at Moraine Valley Comm. College, Palos Hills, IL

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Kilmarnock, VA
    Occupation
    President/Owner
    Posts
    1,338
    Thanks
    52

    Default Re: Degrading audio quality on purpose

    In stead of an "old crappy speaker" you could get one of the new Behringers. That ought to give you exactly what you're looking for.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    perth W Australia
    Occupation
    President/Owner
    Posts
    545
    Thanks
    13

    Default Re: Degrading audio quality on purpose

    you could feed the signal into a cb radio and take the signal off another cb radio, but do not degrade the signal too much as 1940 radios could have a sweet tone, especially lows and mids, but were prone to signal fade.
    And don't forget the valve radio took about a minute to warm up.
    David Ashton
    All Things Theatre
    Perth,Australia

    "for every complex problem there is a solution which is neat, simple,and wrong"
    H. L. Menken

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Utica, NY
    Occupation
    Employee
    Posts
    83
    Thanks
    1

    Default Re: Degrading audio quality on purpose

    Does Audacity not accept plug-ins? If it does, here's a great vinyl "modeler" that can be tuned to add noise, dust, scratches, record player year and stereo/mono - iZotope Vinyl - Authentic Lo-Fi Vinyl Simulation for Pro Tools, VST, MAS, Audio Unit, and DirectX audio applications. And it's FREE!!

    It appears that Audacity does recognize VST plug-ins so this should work.
    Last edited by spiwak2005; February 25th, 2009 at 11:32 AM.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Chicago
    Occupation
    Freelance
    Posts
    23
    Thanks
    0

    Default Re: Degrading audio quality on purpose

    Good thought--I had forgotten that plug was free. It's very useful for this sort of stuff.
    Joe Griffin
    Sound designer
    toxicbag.com

    Current projects:
    in pre-production for "Macbeth" at Moraine Valley Comm. College, Palos Hills, IL

  16. #16
    gafftaper's Avatar
    gafftaper is online now Senior Team
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Seattle, Washington
    Occupation
    College T.D.
    Posts
    7,097
    Thanks
    49

    Default Re: Degrading audio quality on purpose

    Quote Originally Posted by spiwak2005 View Post
    Does Audacity not accept plug-ins? If it does, here's a great vinyl "modeler" that can be tuned to add noise, dust, scratches, record player year and stereo/mono - iZotope Vinyl - Authentic Lo-Fi Vinyl Simulation for Pro Tools, VST, MAS, Audio Unit, and DirectX audio applications. And it's FREE!!

    It appears that Audacity does recognize VST plug-ins so this should work.
    Thanks, That looks like exactly what I'm looking for. I'll give it a try.
    Community College Technical Director

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts