Degrading audio quality on purpose

[gafftaper]

Hi all, we are using SFX for playback and Audacity for editing at the college. This is our fourth show with that combo. I know there are fancier products out there but I'm finding Audacity easy to work with without any real training. My students also like it. So I keep running into situations where I want to take a modern high quality digital recording and degrade it to sound more appropriate for the time period. I've been running a high pass and low pass filter in Audacity and that does a pretty good job but I would really like to be able to take it a step further and put a little bit of dirtiness and noise into it as well.

Is there a feature of Audacity that I'm missing that will do this? Is there another program that will do this easily... without switching to an entirely different product? Are you yelling at the screen to tell me to not be so cheap and buy a better product than free Audacity that has lot's more effect features? Do it the old fashioned way by playing it through an old crappy speaker?

Thanks for your thoughts!

[lieperjp]

Originally Posted by gafftaper

Do it the old fashioned way by playing it through an old crappy speaker?

That's what I do! It's so easy!

[Eboy87]

I did something like this in GarageBand for a friend's school project. He wanted an old 50's PSA film strip sounding voice over, so I just ran it through an amp simulator. I've never really gotten that deep into Audacity (I'm a ProTools kind of guy), but search around for something like that.

[hsaunier]

Not sure what effect you are going after. Try recording the sound of a record player at the end of the album. Use audacity to get rid of the needle skip for every revolution, and then loop it. Mix that track in with your re eq'd vocal and vuala. Again, don't know exactly what you're after. Just a brain storm.

[gafftaper]

The problem is even with the high pass and low pass what remains is a high quality recording. I've been thinking about messing around with adding in a layer of static in the background as hsaunier has suggested but that still doesn't exactly change the fact that I've got a clean original signal.

I think I saw an amp simulator plug in for Audacity. I'll give that a try too.

Perhaps I should just go find myself a crappy old speaker.

[ishboo]

I haven't found an easy way to do this in basic Audacity (no plugins) and I've been in this situation before. I've done what you mentioned about adding a layer of static in the background, I've had relative success with this approach, just choose your static wisely.

[DaveySimps]

Originally Posted by ishboo

choose your static wisely.

If I had a dime for every time I heard that...........

~Dave

[lieperjp]

Originally Posted by gafftaper

The problem is even with the high pass and low pass what remains is a high quality recording. I've got a clean original signal.

Perhaps change that. Use an older mic or older recorder to record the sound so as not to get the cleanest record possible?

[JoeGriffin]

Quite a lot of it depends on what effect you're going for. Groove noise is a good thing to add if you want to make a record-player sound, but probably not if you're looking for a telephone. Think about what the characteristics of the technology you're trying to replicate actually are: limited frequency range? Tape hiss? Static? Groove noise? Turntable rumble? Tape compression? Radio station broadcast limiting? Small, underpowered speakers? Resonant EQ peaks?

You can do an awful lot with EQ, not just high- and low-pass filters but boosting certain frequencies and cutting others (telephones will often have a boost somewhere around the resonant frequency of the human voice...funny how that works).

Compression is also a great tool for "aging" a recording--certain compressors (and limiters) are less transparent than others and if you hit them hard they start to distort and filter the sound.

Then, too, actual distortion is a great tool as well. The amp simulator idea above is a great suggestion, as is the suggestion to send the signal through another speaker and re-record it. In music mixing they call that "re-amping," and in film it's sometimes called "worldizing." Either way, run the signal through an overloaded amp into a cruddy speaker and you'll be well on your way. To something at least...

[gafftaper]

Just to clarify, for those unclear of what I am trying to do. My current example is I've got a perfect crystal clear CD recording of an orchestra playing a song... which is supposed to be coming from a 1940's radio. So I need to degrade the quality enough to make it fit the time period. We are going to try adding a layer of static next ("choose your static wisely"). If that doesn't work, I'm off to Value Village to buy a crappy speaker. I'm thinking I might have good results running it all through a mid range driver and the possibility of poking a couple holes in it is in the back of my mind as well.