BillConnerFASTC
Well-Known Member
NYT article on why surface transmission is a very low risk. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/28/...-kong-minneapolis-your-thursday-briefing.html Kind of makes fogging and UV of dubious value.
Hydrolyte Excelyte Sars Cov 2 EPA Approved Disinfectant 4 Gallons
www.netzerotools.com
?? maybe?
Yes, this is getting to the right type of product - but again - cold atomizing foggers for application. Also from the people in the cleaning industry I've been talking to this is a 3 step process 1) fog until surfaces are damp, 2) wipe clean, 3) fog to dampness again and allow to dry before contact.
So, this is a process, not just turn the fogger on until you can't see and call it done.
Whoa, small print department, it only has a 30 day shelf life!Hydrolyte Excelyte Sars Cov 2 EPA Approved Disinfectant 4 Gallons
www.netzerotools.com
?? maybe?
Then don't store it on a shelf, perhaps it lasts longer stored at floor level? Warped minds want to know.Whoa, small print department, it only has a 30 day shelf life!
There is a country music festival scheduled for early July in Wisconsin.
PSW Thread.
Here is their Safety Plan
Notice point # 20. "Use fogging sanitizer to sanitize large areas such as shower buildings, bathrooms, bar and backstage based on Health Department recommendations"
So, I wonder what knowledge the Health Department staff will have about this? Are there any tested and proven fogging sanitizers available in the US yet?
Oh yeah, the safety plan (at least to me) sure has a lot of wiggle room, like they were just quickly checking off bullet points. One example "We will provide a mask for staff and volunteers".
The longer the last two years have gone on, the more obvious its become that fogging to prevent covid is theaterIt is best to use alcohol. Among antiseptics, ethyl alcohol comes first. It is worth remembering that operating rooms are treated with it - and immediately, the confidence in this disinfectant increases. You can use 70% alcohol for surface treatment. But a 90% concentration will be ineffective. This mixture is too strong and destroys the cell membrane instantly, but does not have time to get to the virus itself due to the lack of water in the composition. The guys at <removed>, a cleaning company, gave me the idea. I thought the higher the degree, the better.
oh this whole covid thing is freaking me outIt is best to use alcohol. Among antiseptics, ethyl alcohol comes first. It is worth remembering that operating rooms are treated with it - and immediately, the confidence in this disinfectant increases. You can use 70% alcohol for surface treatment. But a 90% concentration will be ineffective. This mixture is too strong and destroys the cell membrane instantly, but does not have time to get to the virus itself due to the lack of water in the composition. The guys at emop.co.uk, a cleaning company, gave me the idea. I thought the higher the degree, the better.
Public heath, my personal health and safety at work, and the health and safety of others in the work place ARE priority things to care about.oh this whole covid thing is freaking me out
why people don't see that we have much more important things to care about???
Agreed. It became clear by midsummer 2020 that SARS-CoV-2 was a respiratory virus with little documented (almost none) fomite transmission. My earlier post was to not be dismissive of this virus, not to support sanitizing foggers.When all this started we were concerned with virus contamination of surfaces. We now know that very few infections start that way and that aerial transmission is primary.
So I wonder, would working in a proper haze do any good? Or to put it another way. At what density does the haze absorb enough virus to make a medical difference?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.