*Takes a shot...*
"Whenever there is an off-duty tech at an event, there will be technical chaos, invoking bad comments from said tech."
Hmm. I'm yet to be convinced... Here's my suggestion:
For any event in which techs or "techs" or in attendance and not working, said techs will always believe something to be wrong and will be instinctively compelled to make comment on the same.
Nice try Chris but it's too metric.
How about...
"In any event where the party of the first part (from here on known as the Host) is declared to be a theater technician and the party of the second part (from here on known as the guest) is also declared to be a theater technician, if said guest is declared to be off duty from their usual technical theater occupation, the party of the second part will be instinctualy driven to believe that something is amiss with the execution of the technical aspects of the gathering. In such a case, the laws of probability predict that the "guest" will be compelled to complain about the quality of the technical aspects of the gathering."
How 'bout this one?
Whenever something goes wrong at an event, any tech in attendance but not working will compulsively make comment as to how they would have fixed it better, irrespective of whether it was in fact better.
Let's put it simply.
Techs make horrible audience members. They will always find something they think is wrong and will complain about it.
It bites..(darned character minimum)
actually its 10 bytes (minimum)..... 20 if it's stored in unicode
I think you haven't heard of sarcasm.I think avkid means its evil.
I think you haven't heard of sarcasm.
Techs = Critics
Hows that for a great new mathematical equation? I could be famous!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.