And that's as may be.
But the topic at hand was *contribution to the inaccuracy of this report*, and that seems to be mostly 'unreliable eyewitness, possibly with an axe to grind', no? His report wasn't *more* inaccurate because it was on Twitter, right?
And FMEng: I feel like I need to point out that you seem to be blaming the tool: are you not suggesting that if people *were less able to communicate at the retail level*, those things would not have gotten as far out of hand?
I mean, that's *right*, but I don't think it's the fault of the tools; it's the fault of the *idiots*...