Some interesting points
Behringer was taken to court re blatant copying and lost the case.
It is one thing to copy the design, it another to simply take the
unit apart, strip down the pc boards layer by layer and photographically reproduce the same exact board, down to specifically placed non functioning
layout placed there solely for detection.
Be careful of online reviews, many of the manufactures both place positive reviews of their gear, and negative reviews of the competition.
Anyone is certainly free to accept or decline any advice, and advice is worth what you paid for it.
Anyone is free to buy recommend or use what ever they please. Quality is something that cannot be tested into a product, and basically it comes down to a trade off of quality interms of performance and reliability.
Behringer has carved out a market section for themselves. Some of their products have found some acceptance, some of the amps, and initially when it came out the
dsp system. Over time a number of people have had problems, and have had to have the
unit replaced. If you are in a non time critical situation, this might work just fine. If on the other
hand the
system dies during a performance it might be different.
Maintenance does help improve the longevity of products, but that is true of any product. An experienced design person can open up a product and look to see how the quality of the assembly is done, the selection of individual components, and
point out where corners have been cut.
Using the product every night, in many cases helps it to last longer, it is just the occasional use, stored in the closet taken out once in a while that some of the cheaper products tend to fail.
Many of these products don't have any real ability to be maintained, sliders and pots are sealed, so it is not a "Maintenence" issue or item. I think just dismissing negative opinions on a product as product or vendor bashing misses the
point. People asked for opinions, and they were given. Obviously if no one ever bought Behringer gear they would have gone out of business years ago.
Personally I think a high school environment is a pretty harsh environment, and that ruggedized gear is the way to go vs gear that is more designed for a bedroom studio, but again that is just an opinion.
If you were to talk to hundreds of professional sound people, with experience on the lower end of the equipment scale, people who are in a closely related a space as a school environment, I believe that you would find on the analog side of things most people today recommending the
Allen and Heath Gear. Main reason is that A&H has implimented an excellent support organization and that their mix wiz and gl 2400 series has proven to be an excellent value. On the digital side of things
Yamaha 01v96 has received the same
level of high support, AND many of the people are using the Behringer ADA8000 mic preamp units with it so it is not a no Behringer no way deal. This is looking at equipment budgets typically in the under 2500 dollar range. Many people had and do continue to use
Mackie, most have found that as they age they have become problematic, have a major problem with RF noise and a design problem with the ribbon cables, and
Mackie is expensive to fix, BUT there are still alot of 1604,24-4,32-4 out there, when asked what they are upgrading to , the two above solutions tend to be recommended. The new
Mackie Onyx
line is still a
bit early to tell, some people seem to be impressed. Soundcraft had a good reputation, had some products that had issues and were dropped and has been competing on the lower end with A&H.
Peavey has been making in roads on the smaller
line array side of things, they bought Crest a while back, but never seemed to be able to break into the
mixer business in a major way, I think
Mackie was too strong. Carvin entered this area also with small step up from Behringer type of an offering, and again the experience has been "mixed"
Once you get on the upper end, for the most part it is
Yamaha and Midas domininated, some soundcraft, digico
etc et.
Yamaha has been focusing on filling in the digital market quite well from the 01v06 and up.
I think some of my comments were mis interpreted. Personally I believe today that a
digital mixer offers the best combination of price performance and function, and as a learning experience gives the person using it a wide range of tools to learn and use to bring out the best sound performance possible.
The comment about a workman never complains about his tools is usefull but not always relevant to this space, mainly because it assumed he had the tools, a workman being given the task of planing a large board probably would complain if he were only to have a hammer and a screwdriver.
So I an not saying that unless you have the finest SSL
console in the world with millions of dollars worth of the finest outboard gear are you able to get great sound, but it is easy to dismiss the
array of tools that DO make a difference in the sound that are too expensive on an individual basis, but in a
digital mixer setup can become affordable and available. You only need to look At the digital recording setups today with software plugins available to see just how effective and useful these tools can be.
But again, its horses for courses, each
purchase decision can be made on its own merits. No one on this site is selling anyone anything, simply attempting to offer the best advice they can based on their experience.
It is like buying a car, you can read the adverts, look at owner comments, read magazine and tv program reviews or talk to the mechanics that fix them. Sometimes they all agree, many times they don't. It is up to the potential buyer to decide what opinions and information to pick and choose from. Since this is primarily an educational forum I think it is useful to have extended discussions, if nothing more than for a learning experience.
Sharyn