Cat 5 for DMX in the wall wiring

Greetings, John here, lights and backdrop guy for Faithbridge in Spring (NW Houston), TX

Will Cat 5 work for in the wall wiring for DMX? I understand the 120 ohm situation. I can't find the impedance and for sure understand the no mic cable situation.
If not Cat 5 in the wall what is a good cable to put in the wall?

JP
 
I use CAT5 for all my permanent installs where there not going to be a lot of electrical interference.

Mike
 
Category 5 cable is an excellent alternative to traditional DMX cable for in-wall applications (provided it is inside conduit) and the practice is actually recommended in Nick Mobsby's book, Practical DMX.

See also ANSI E1.27-2 - 2009:Entertainment Technology - Recommended Practice for Permanently Installed Control Cables for Use with ANSI E1.11 (DMX512-A) and USITT DMX512/1990 Products from ESTA's Technical Standards Program.


Outside the wall and for Portable Control Cables? Not so much. Some reasons: Most RJ-45 connectors are delicate and not designed for repeated mating cycles, 22 AWG solid cable is fragile, and kinks easily when coiled. Most A/V companies that use long runs of it for video purposes test it before every use. There's no cost-benefit to shielded, stranded, ruggedized UTP cable over say a Belden 9842 (pdf). From Belden's document:
A third cable alternative is Category cables, such as Category 5e, or 6. These are most often UTP, unshielded twisted pairs. Their impedance (100Ω) puts them reasonably close to the 120Ω of RS-485. Further, while they can run DMX-512 today, there is a lot of work being done to use the Ethernet® networking protocol for DMX-512. That would mean that Category data cables installed today to run DMX-512 could also run Ethernet tomorrow. It also means that the same cable type could be used for both Ethernet and DMX-512 applications. There are dozens and dozens of UTP Category cables that might be considered for DMX-512.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Don't strip the cable and terminate to compression screw terminals, crimps or solder joints--that will cause big reliability issues!
The dickens you say? Works fine with every phone jack in my house. What about P-nuts?
 
Cat 5 is 8 conductors in four pairs. When using it for DMX, one pair is connected to pins 2 & 3. If you are using 5 pin DMX, the second pair should go to pins 4 & 5. The other two pairs (all 4 wires) should all go to pin 1. Keep your polarity consistent. Never parallel a pair! Only one wire each on pins 2,3,4,5. If you one of those crazy rebels using 3 pin, all unused wires should go to pin 1.

When used in building wiring, the conduit itself serves as a shield. Never run it in a conduit that contains building power!

Now, on to the "Opinion" section ;) :

1) The Cat line should be the ONLY wire in the conduit.

2) You may have problems finding XLR wall mount connectors with insulation displacement terminals. I have not run into issues using the solder type connectors. Just remember, you are making a connection that runs at RF frequencies, workmanship is important.

3) Now, my most controversial point: Outside of the wall, don't use Cat cable. Not only is it fragile, it's not shielded. This post will probably be followed by a half dozen posts from people who have no problem with it. I'm glad for them! I, however, will never do it.
 
I am with you JD. I only use the recommended Belkin cable outside of walls (unless I run in conduit then I will use CAT5 even outside the wall).

Mike
 
The dickens you say? Works fine with every phone jack in my house. What about P-nuts?

How lucky do you feel?

When there's an unplanned blackout, I'll give the audience your number. Oh wait, your phone might not be working due to broken wires. ;)

Seriously, the problem is with stripping the Cat5 without nicking it, making it subject to future fracture. Might work, might not. Why take the chance? Be conservative. The audience will like you for it.

FYI, ETC makes a CAT5 insulation displacement XLR-5 wall mount, and perhaps others do as well.


ST
 
Of course, it's not cheap, either.

Of course, neither is standard DMX! Looks like good cable. Seen it listed before but never tried any. Again, the shielding issue is the thing for me.
 
...it's not shielded. This post will probably be followed by a half dozen posts from people who have no problem with it. I'm glad for them! I, however, will never do it.
OK, I'll bite...

In my experience, both with DMX in fairly simple setups, and with RS-485 in high noise environments, unless your practice is to wrap your DMX cable around one leg of your 400A feed, or to not terminate your DMX, then the shielding isn't necessary.

Now, I will agree, in situations with marginal connections or unterminated connections, the shielding may afford you some additional level of reliability.

-Fred
 
Don't forget that category cables with solid conductors can only be reliably terminated into insulation-displacement (vampire tap) wiring devices intended for the purpose.

Don't strip the cable and terminate to compression screw terminals, crimps or solder joints--that will cause big reliability issues!

ST

I beg to differ. It's not the type of wire, it is the workmanship of the termination that counts. Use the wrong strippers, or make a cold solder joint, then yes it will be unreliable. Done properly, any of the methods mentioned above will work long after we're dead and gone.

By the same token, I can make a very unreliable RJ-45 termination by simply using plugs designed for stranded wire on solid conductors. The clear RJ-45s are ONLY for use on stranded wire. Smoke colored ones are designed for solid conductors. Pick the wrong one and all bets are off about it working without intermittent problems. This seems to be a well kept secret. I often see the connectors used on the wrong kind of cable with disastrous results.
 
By the same token, I can make a very unreliable RJ-45 termination by simply using plugs designed for stranded wire on solid conductors. The clear RJ-45s are ONLY for use on stranded wire. Smoke colored ones are designed for solid conductors.
That's the first I've ever heard of smoke color connectors being the only ones for solid conductors. Can you point to a standard or a reference for this?

-Fred
 
the smoke colored connectors must be specific to a manufacturer. I have clear ones for solid wire (three prongs to pierce the conductors insulation -these are the best kind)

I agree about this being a well kept secret. I constantly come across people who are convinced theyre god's gift to network wiring using the wrong crimps
 
Insulation displacement connectors and RJ45s were adopted by telecom companies because they are incredibly reliable with very little training needed making them perfect for use in wiring the nation's phone system! However, what works in one industry may not work well in others. Generally, you don't have to worry about connectors being run over repeatedly by hand trucks, or plugged and unplugged 10,000 times when working with phone equipment. In the entertainment industry, you can almost bet on that treatment! (thus the love of the metal covered XLR connector.) Telecom stuff works great in the wall, but not out where the humans are romping about. ;)
 
this is all interest stuff because i'm fitting out DMX cable runs with stranded cat5e STP (shielded twisted pair) for an Auditorium on metal cable trays along side other audio and video cables so i hope it all works out all right but have been told by others who have done it and it does works well. The cat5e STP is about double the price of standard cat5e.
Cheers, GT
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back