No, sorry, the post was not
clear due to poor grammar, lazy typing and no spell check.
I was actually ragged on last week in the LightNetwork for using the term FWIW, being called lazy. The critics post was all in non-capitalized letters, including the letter "i" in place of the word "I", failed to use punctuation,
etc.. which made it pretty funny (who's being lazy), but this is usually stuff I have no problem with, as long as the post makes sense !, which tech_mans did not, thus the appropriate
return comment. Remember that I did apologize in
advance for being tired and cranky !.
SB
Iwouldhopethatallofusaremoreforgivingthanthoseofthelightingnetworkforspelllingandpunctuation, thisgivenmanywon!thavemuchexperiencewithitorbeinsomecaseslazyandnottrainedenoughtogetintohabitofdoingatleastit sufficiently by habit.
Man, that was probably the hardest sentence I ever typed. By nature or training and typing class in high school, my hands have their proper keyboard positions and it's really hard to not space between words. In fact, mostly I had to backspace between letters. Of all theater classes - normally a "A", I frequently didn't do well in English. Back in grammer school, I often found it easier to write 80x for each misspelled word, while watching Barney Miller on TV than to learn the words for my spelling test. Relief - yep I did it as Rolaids on the spelling test. Over the years it or this semi-mastery of the language has gotten better, much less I'm well over the 26 words per minute I graduated typing class with, but still I'm not perfect either.
In my view, post as best you can. If you cannot post sufficient to be understood, edit later or expect that you won't get an answer. But do post away as best you can. Often even if not well posted, it's better to post a thought than to leave a hole in your thought on the subject.
Mocking others for doing so, na, cite at most but answer the question still. Accept that some master words, others perhaps master art. Very much a left and right side of the brain thing I believe between language and effort.
As for answer or response on my part, I agree with much posted and cite perhaps brand and saturation of the
gel as a potential problem.
Heat shield needs a gap between it and the
gel, over abundance of oil based
haze or
fog can cause problems with
gel and in geneal well seated, bench focused lamps and maintained fixtures could also cause problems. Beyond this, perhaps if searching for some balance between 575w and 750w in the GLA to GLD series, perhaps a EHG lamp would be a
bit cooler. A less efficient
filament might have a
bit less of a focused beam of light upon the center of the
gel. Could be a theory that the
filament is just too efficient in the focused beam of light for the
gel. A less efficient lamp could potentially solve the problem as a theory as with just turning the output down by 10%.