Now that electronic driver logs will be mandatory in all trucks we're reassessing the situation. Updating our trucks with electronics will cost us a bunch of $$ that we'll simply have to absorb. Our biz is down 15% this year so the expense represents a major spend - on something we can't recover from clients.
My question for Blacksheep and others - how do you legitimately let someone drive who's already worked a 12-18 hour day? That's a violation of hours of service and the driver's only option is to lie about it when making his/her logbook entries. After the inevitable wreck this duplicity will be exposed and *maybe* the production company as well as the driver will be liable.
Right now, if you work a 16 hour day and refuse to drive your employer can fire you and you won't get unemployment. Refusing to violate the law is seen as refusal to perform a legitimate job duty owed to an employer. This is why, further up-thread, that I said driving should be it's own employment category. I don't care if the boss pays you more, you're still driving after working a full production day, you're NOT going to be in compliance and unless an investigation shows the employer required you to drive, the DRIVER is 100% liable for all deaths, injuries and property losses. Think about that for a minute. The only reason a plaintiff's lawyer will put the production company in the list of defendants is because the company has more insurance and assets.
If you're driving after an 8 hour gig and it's 2 hours back to the shop it's one thing - to drive 12 hours to the next gig after working 16 hours... that's potentially criminal if you cause a wreck.
My question for Blacksheep and others - how do you legitimately let someone drive who's already worked a 12-18 hour day? That's a violation of hours of service and the driver's only option is to lie about it when making his/her logbook entries. After the inevitable wreck this duplicity will be exposed and *maybe* the production company as well as the driver will be liable.
Right now, if you work a 16 hour day and refuse to drive your employer can fire you and you won't get unemployment. Refusing to violate the law is seen as refusal to perform a legitimate job duty owed to an employer. This is why, further up-thread, that I said driving should be it's own employment category. I don't care if the boss pays you more, you're still driving after working a full production day, you're NOT going to be in compliance and unless an investigation shows the employer required you to drive, the DRIVER is 100% liable for all deaths, injuries and property losses. Think about that for a minute. The only reason a plaintiff's lawyer will put the production company in the list of defendants is because the company has more insurance and assets.
If you're driving after an 8 hour gig and it's 2 hours back to the shop it's one thing - to drive 12 hours to the next gig after working 16 hours... that's potentially criminal if you cause a wreck.