@Brenden Friedel Have you considered Yamaha's MG series with optional rack mount ears? [Or is it too old school for you?]
@RonHebbard I came across that one and was torn between that and one of these@Brenden Friedel Have you considered Yamaha's MG series with optional rack mount ears? [Or is it too old school for you?]
The sub group outputs allow a degree of flexibility.
https://ca.yamaha.com/en/products/proaudio/mixers/mg_series_xu_model/index.html
Toodleoo!
Ron Hebbard
@Brenden Friedel I'll OPENLY admit to being HEAVILY biased.@RonHebbard I came across that one and was torn between that and one of these
BEHRINGER XENYX 1204USB Not sure which one to go with for the money
and analog consoles are not to old school just prefer digital over them due to the easier eq but thats not important for this bulid
I love yamaha they are a great company im just on a budget and don't think i can spend that extra 50 for the yamaha. Plus this one comes with xlr out on the back instead of top and bulit in effects. Don't get me wrong yamaha is amazing i love their LS9 and TF5 and have a Clav. Just on a tight budget@Brenden Friedel I'll OPENLY admit to being HEAVILY biased.
I've owned at least four Yamaha consoles over the course of at least four decades and have NEVER been let down or disappointed. I'm equally, if not more so, PROUD to proclaim NEVER having owned any Behringer gear. I guess I can say Behringer's never let me down either but that'd be because I've never given them the opportunity.
I still recall when Behringer copied one of QSC's power amps and copied it SO CLOSELY they had Bob Lee's name still etched on their main PC board. Bob Lee; Good people. QSC; good people building good products. Behringer; BOO! HISS!!
If you want to talk EQ; I think four or eight band fully parametric and primarily Orban with White and UREI in the background.
'nuff said. Case rested.
Toodleoo!
Ron Hebbard.
@Brenden Friedel You might also consider Rane for small mixers:I love yamaha they are a great company im just on a budget and don't think i can spend that extra 50 for the yamaha. Plus this one comes with xlr out on the back instead of top and bulit in effects. Don't get me wrong yamaha is amazing i love their LS9 and TF5 and have a Clav. Just on a tight budget
@Brenden Friedel The phrase: "Never money to do it right, ALWAYS money to do it twice" keeps coming to mind here, closely followed by buy once cry once.I love yamaha they are a great company im just on a budget and don't think i can spend that extra 50 for the yamaha. Plus this one comes with xlr out on the back instead of top and bulit in effects. Don't get me wrong yamaha is amazing i love their LS9 and TF5 and have a Clav. Just on a tight budget
@Brenden Friedel You might also consider Rane for small mixers:
http://www.rane.com/mlm82s.html
Toodleoo!
Ron Hebbard.
I love yamaha they are a great company im just on a budget and don't think i can spend that extra 50 for the yamaha. Plus this one comes with xlr out on the back instead of top and bulit in effects. Don't get me wrong yamaha is amazing i love their LS9 and TF5 and have a Clav. Just on a tight budget
@Brenden Friedel I'll OPENLY admit to being HEAVILY biased.
I've owned at least four Yamaha consoles over the course of at least four decades and have NEVER been let down or disappointed. I'm equally, if not more so, PROUD to proclaim NEVER having owned any Behringer gear. I guess I can say Behringer's never let me down either but that'd be because I've never given them the opportunity.
I still recall when Behringer copied one of QSC's power amps and copied it SO CLOSELY they had Bob Lee's name still etched on their main PC board. Bob Lee; Good people. QSC; good people building good products. Behringer; BOO! HISS!!
If you want to talk EQ; I think four or eight band fully parametric and primarily Orban with White and UREI in the background.
'nuff said. Case rested.
Toodleoo!
Ron Hebbard.
@Footer It'll take far more to make me forgive their previous transgressions, things like copying one of QSC's designs including design engineer Bob Lee's name on the main PC board's etching.You are a bit out of the loop then. Ever since the X32 came out Behringer has been a totally new company. They now produce easily the most rider friendly desk for the club market out there. A and B national tours are carrying their desks. Their hardware is rock solid. I own an X32, M32, and X-air and have had zero issues with any of them... going on 5 years. They are more reliable then my 20k Midas Pro2's. Behringer produced a beyond excellent desk that really blew up the lower end of the market. I would not even think of buying any other desk if I needed 32 channels or less.
Also, I get disappointed every time I touch an LS9 or M7... they sound like total garbage.
I’m not looking at it for a production. At my school I’m in charge of getting a mixer to support to mics and an aux with a left and right output to for speakers that are daisy chained that’s all I’m looking for nothing specialBehringers analog stuff is very hit or miss. I still have an UB2442FX... it still kinda works but is not really usable for a production environment... granted its 15 years old! They really have not put that much development into their analog line... most of their stuff is pretty much straight Mackie clones. If it hits the pricepoint you need do it, but don't expect it to last forever.
On the flipside, if you could use a x-air mixer do it... they are beyond excellent.
What do you mean? Like the mics it self sound terrible or just your eq?You are a bit out of the loop then. Ever since the X32 came out Behringer has been a totally new company. They now produce easily the most rider friendly desk for the club market out there. A and B national tours are carrying their desks. Their hardware is rock solid. I own an X32, M32, and X-air and have had zero issues with any of them... going on 5 years. They are more reliable then my 20k Midas Pro2's. Behringer produced a beyond excellent desk that really blew up the lower end of the market. I would not even think of buying any other desk if I needed 32 channels or less.
Also, I get disappointed every time I touch an LS9 or M7... they sound like total garbage.
I’m not looking at it for a production. At my school I’m in charge of getting a mixer to support to mics and an aux with a left and right output to for speakers that are daisy chained that’s all I’m looking for nothing special
What do you mean? Like the mics it self sound terrible or just your eq?
The older Yamaha digital stuff sounds very harsh and digital compared to a comparable analog desk. A 58 on a yamaha desk sounds way different then a 58 through most other desks. The CL series does not have this issue, but the older ones did. The M7 was one of the reasons that for years many engineers would not touch digital. I can still hear the difference between our Midas digital desk and a CL5, but that has more to do with the way you can over drive the preamp then the actual sound of the desk.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.