MPowers
Well-Known Member
.........Yes, strobes work fine and are easier to implement, but there is a vertical motion flicker on the lobsterscope that gives it a different look to the eye. It has it's nitch place, although most often it ends up on the shelf. The strobe lights the whole area on each flash, the lobsterscope sweeps the field of view on each "flash."
John is 100% correct in his assessment of the FX. The issue is: will the difference be discernible to the audience in this context and, if so, will it have any effect on the quality of their experience. For example, in Christopher Durang's “A History of the American Film” I feel (IMHO) the answer is yes. In other shows the FX might be so short or the dialogue and action context might make it unimportant or irrelevant. One thing that I've learned over the years is to judge the degree and effectiveness of an effect by the response of a non techie. Even a sophisticated theatre buff doesn't see what we see. That doesn't mean we can toss something off, "They'll never see it from the third row", but if we are trying to make a point, we have to be sure the audience will see it. Anyway, just thoughts.