It's a community college, the state mandates that when we update our course descriptions we reference recent texts. Very annoying for a field as specialized as ours.
It's worse than annoying; it's utterly stupid, in my opinion, and not even in the best interests of students. It is most annoying to spend $50 or $100 or more for a textbook just to be told in a year that you must buy the next edition with no particular substantive changes (and, since your copy is now the old edition, get even less selling it back to the bookstore). In many cases, too, the policy would prevent using the best texts simply because they're not the newest texts; and that's about as anti-student as things come. Most fields don't change that quickly, whether or not they are specialized; a ten year old calculus text teaches the exact same mathematics as a two year old one (and a twenty-five year old one), with the main updates being ancillary sidebars such as biographies of famous, female, or minority mathematicians; updates to computer and calculator tools for solving problems; and such like things that my professors, at least, usually skipped over entirely as not important to the subject at
hand.
What would happen if your submission kept the same good texts and truthfully stated that you could not find any adequate newer textbooks to reference? Is this a legal requirement established by statute, or a policy "requirement" of some bureaucracy, and if the latter is there any sort of
escape to sanity?