A center array versus split left/right seems to go right to the heart of the intelligibility versus localization/'space' argument. Typically a center array would be expected to result in better intelligibility for spoken word and vocals, but be more limited in supporting 'space' for music playback and performances. Neither is right nor wrong, just emphasizing two different aspects that may be involved and you may have to decide which is more important to you.So far, we've had two companies come in to provide a system bid, and it hasn't been apples-to-apples which has me excited: the first suggested single cabinet fills mounted on the proscenium wall L and R and two center mains. They also spec'd two subs on either side of the proscenium (on the deck). All cabinets/subs are EAW. The other is looking at a small line array (not a true but curvilivear) L and R rigged from the roof truss - likely 3-4 cabinets per side (spec'd JBL) with a flown sub on each side as well.
The main advantage is limiting the speaker level lengths to minimize losses. But this is also an area where the existing infrastructure can matter as relocating system DSP and amplifiers can potentially require conduit and power changes that may not justify the potential benefit.I know it's generally better to have the amp rack backstage closer to speakers; however, ours is current in the sound booth in the BOH (it has been since the auditorium's construction in '91). One company spec'd to move the rack backstage while the other didn't mention it. I'd like to get thoughts on this difference and any long-term concerns.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.