BillConnerFASTC
Well-Known Member
That was on a wish list for a new project. My first meeting with the school is next week. Anyone have any ideas of what they have in mind?
Just like with power steering, brakes, and everything else it took time. Not many people decided they needed power steering or brakes enough to spend money and retrofit them to their current car. They waited until they bought a new car to worry about that, the current system worked well enough. Same deal here, not many spaces are going to spend that kind of money to replace something they already have that works just fine. The change will come with new spaces and big renovations.
Well, certainly Clancy's Power Assist is just that - a way to drive a counterweight set up yo 1000 pounds out of balance. But hardly provides a manual back-pedaling unless having a contractor come in and remove the drive, and restore floor block, rope lock, and handline.
The mods are happy to oblige...And the title should be in quotes - came from them.
Hmmmm. What am I missing? Controls definitely digital and readouts as to elevation and presets - not just up and down buttons. And I was proposing all motorized - probably 24-32 sets - not just electrics.
What I was trying to figure out was what do they think is electric but if motor is not working they can run manually? I once saw a system that was basically manual but had means to connect and disconnect a counterweight assist. (IIRC KA has a variant of this - small one line Big Tows driving abor heavy sets?)
Right now, I think all motorized at least for the 24+ sets with a mix of capacities and fixed and variable speeds - assigned masking and electrics rather than all flexible - is just twice the cost of manual - product, install, infrastructure, electrical cost, etc. - total project cost. Not bad as I'm sure it was 5 to 8 times 10-15 years ago.
Are they equal? That's hard to agree on. Every counterweight set is naturally variable speed and possible to run at speed of or above the typical fast package hoist. Capacities - I routinely make every counterweight set 2000 pounds but a motorized set for a border might be 600 pounds max - so is that "equal"? Not simple questions.
I do believe that we should be moving toward motorizing rigging faster than we are. Power steering, power brakes, power garaged doors, powered everything - except stage rigging. The more there is, the better it will be, and the less expensive it will be. I see evidence frequently of crashed counterweight sets. Have not seen a motorized set crash yet.
I suspect we'll settle on motorized electrics and shell ceiling, and rest manual, in which case with rigging pit I'll use a power assist type device on those. Easy to add on or subtract with the rigging pit, easy to wire, easy to service. Pragmatism (AKA budget) usually wins out.
Still want to know what they are thinking of or what salesman came up with this appealing phrase for what product.
I skipped through some of the comments so forgive me if this has been covered, but this sounds like someone asking for a simple control panel so they or some other crotchety old stagehand don't have to mess with any darn computers just to bump in lineset. When I read that I'm imagining a panel that has a keyed switch to take manual control, a rotary selector switch to choose your lineset and jog up and down buttons. It's manual in that they can just take control and go without writing a cue. Obviously the automation server is handling things like brakes, default AVDs, and limits in the background anyway, but the customer doesn't need to worry about that at this point. I'm not wild about the idea, but I can see how a TD that's inexperienced with automation could see doing any and all trim adjustments from a console as an unnecessary hassle at times.
A good possibility. Hopefully I'll find out Thursday in my first meeting with them.Just to enter the betting pool: my guess is someone on the committee said "We should be state of the art and have motorized rigging," and someone else said, "Automatic stuff always breaks, let's make sure there's a manual override." And a spec was born.
@BillConnerFASTC Your query has been nagging at me since you posted and I woke up with the following dawning on me this morning:That was on a wish list for a new project. My first meeting with the school is next week. Anyone have any ideas of what they have in mind?
I, for one enjoy your RANTS, they are always informative and to be literary and/or theatrical, "Please sir may I have some more?"@BillConnerFASTC
WITH APOLOGIES FOR RANTING and I've once again flapped my mouth too much.
Toodleoo!
Ron Hebbard.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.