What does Arc Flash look like?

starksk

ETC Senior Technical Support Specialist
Fight Leukemia
Inspired by a previous and now closed thread:

Check out this video from the NFPA: [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Qq7U7tFsvQ[/media]

This video is a demonstration of the awesome power of an arc flash using an open circuit breaker panel in a test environment.

A good reminder of why PPE is ALWAYS a good idea!

_________________

~Kirk
 
Inspired by a previous and now closed thread:

Check out this video from the NFPA: This video is a demonstration of the awesome power of an arc flash using an open circuit breaker panel in a test environment.

A good reminder of why PPE is ALWAYS a good idea!

_________________

~Kirk

To be fair, Arc Flash PPE looks rather like EOD PPE:

15 Cal Arc Flash Protection Kit - Mitchell Instrument Company

And costs a lot of money. Which is a great reason to call someone who knows how to avoid this.
 
Disappointing that in the video Steve says "...to see what happens when we create an arc flash.," but does not elaborate as to how or why an arc flash happens. Does an arc flash happen every time a disconnect is energized? How can they be prevented? What is the proper PPE to protect oneself?


(Steve Thomas sure is looking old. I bet NFPA doesn't pay as well as TOH. I can't stand Kevin O'Connor.)
 
Disappointing that in the video Steve says "...to see what happens when we create an arc flash.," but does not elaborate as to how or why an arc flash happens. Does an arc flash happen every time a disconnect is energized? How can they be prevented? What is the proper PPE to protect oneself?


(Steve Thomas sure is looking old. I bet NFPA doesn't pay as well as TOH. I can't stand Kevin O'Connor.)

Arc flash - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia has some good information on how likely it is, and some good info on PPE. If I understand it properly, if your working on a 120V system, your probably not in the danger zone for this particular danger (there are plenty still about tho).
 
The following is a severely dumbed down explanation of what happens in an arc flash from the following article:

Pressures Developed by Arcs, by Ralph H. Lee

In an arc flash incident, part of the copper wire instantly vaporizes, expanding to 67,000 times its original volume, resulting in a powerful pressure wave which propels droplets of molten metal up to 10 ft. from the electrical panel. Additionally, super heated plasma (ionized vapor) is propelled a distance proportional to the arc power. The air in the arc stream instantly heats the air air around it to about 35,000 degrees Fahrenheit.
 
I feel I need to interject that the magnitude of an arc flash hazard is mainly dependent on two variables: the amount of available fault current, and the fault clearing time.

I'm curious - How many licensed electricians out there calculate the arc flash incident energy before doing live work? I do a lot of medium and high voltage work in industrial environments (refineries and chemical plants). Almost all now have minimum PPE requirements that are based on the arc flash incident energy available at the point of work. Arc flash calculations result in the amount of PPE required at a particular distance from the arc. For example, to close a medium voltage switchgear breaker (1200A) from directly in front of the switchgear cubicle, you would most likely have to wear at least a 45cal/cm^2 flash suit. That is even if you can close the breaker when standing in front of it. A lot of times the incident energy is so high that there is no available PPE that meets the requirements. In this case you have to remotely close the breaker. This is at the medium and high voltage level though. I can honestly say that I've never had to wear a flash suit to work at the 120/240V level. Normally the source impedance is high enough that there is not enough available fault current to warrant anything more than standard FRC's, if that.

Of course, this is a generalization, and should not be taken in place of a proper engineering analysis of a particular situation.

Simply put - don't do hot work unless you are trained to do so, and are taking the proper precautions. Even then, if there is a way to de-energize, DO IT.
 
I used to have to wear the 40cal dracula suits regularly. It is my understanding that anything above that cal rating is kinda pointless, as the concussion will kill ya, regardless of the heat, shrapnel, vaporized metals, etc.
 
I used to have to wear the 40cal dracula suits regularly. It is my understanding that anything above that cal rating is kinda pointless, as the concussion will kill ya, regardless of the heat, shrapnel, vaporized metals, etc.

Circle gets the square! Who cares about burns when there's a steel door flying at you at extreme velocity...
 
It always amazes me how a high current circuit breaker is able to contain itself when a dead load occurs without shattering. When you think about it, much of the same things is occurring inside that little Bakelite case. (Same with high current fuses.)

I have to wonder what the contactor that was used to energize that panel looked like after the demo.
 
I feel I need to interject that the magnitude of an arc flash hazard is mainly dependent on two variables: the amount of available fault current, and the fault clearing time.

I'm curious - How many licensed electricians out there calculate the arc flash incident energy before doing live work? I do a lot of medium and high voltage work in industrial environments (refineries and chemical plants). Almost all now have minimum PPE requirements that are based on the arc flash incident energy available at the point of work. Arc flash calculations result in the amount of PPE required at a particular distance from the arc. For example, to close a medium voltage switchgear breaker (1200A) from directly in front of the switchgear cubicle, you would most likely have to wear at least a 45cal/cm^2 flash suit. That is even if you can close the breaker when standing in front of it. A lot of times the incident energy is so high that there is no available PPE that meets the requirements. In this case you have to remotely close the breaker. This is at the medium and high voltage level though. I can honestly say that I've never had to wear a flash suit to work at the 120/240V level. Normally the source impedance is high enough that there is not enough available fault current to warrant anything more than standard FRC's, if that.

Of course, this is a generalization, and should not be taken in place of a proper engineering analysis of a particular situation.

Simply put - don't do hot work unless you are trained to do so, and are taking the proper precautions. Even then, if there is a way to de-energize, DO IT.

I would suggest there are ery few electricians who are capable of analysing the arc flash energy for a given facility.

The short circuit coordination study which is an essential prerequisite to perform an arc flash analysis produce the arc flash boundary and energy for each breaker panel and the required level of PPE, this information must be attached to the panel and no one can open the panel without wearing the PPE and no one may be within the boundary range who is not wearing the PPE and who has not completed arc flash training. A faulty breaker, fuse or piece of equipment can produce an arc flash.

I have just finally completed reviewing the arc flash analysis and the short circuit study performed by an electrical consulting firm for the industrial facility where I work. We use a large electrical contracting company to perform all our electrical installation and maintenance work - I retained a consulting engineering company to do the arc flash and work because none of the two hundred plus engineers who work at this company - including myself - have the theoretical background or practical exprience in this field. This work took six months to complete with all the recomendations.

This facility has two seperate high voltage three phase feeds with high voltage transformers and multiple medium to low voltage transformers and more than sixty panels. We have major air conditioning equipment on site a large machine shop, enironmental test capabilities and a large office facilities.

We had some surprising results from the short circuit coordination study which required every panel transformer, breaker and load to be reviewed, face plate data to be collected etc. we found that the electrical contractors had installed the wrong fuses in some locations because they had attempted to work out the required fuses themselves using rules of thumb. Particularly problematic was they had not realised hat when you short out a circuit which has motors whose armatures are turning that the motor behaves as a generator and also produces current into the short circuit which in the case of one of our circuits increased the short circuit current by 25%. Unfortunately the time response and current interrupt rating of the fuses meant that the fuses nearest the load could not interrupt the fault current so the current continued to flow after the fuse melted and the response time of the next fuse was too slow producing a major arc flash which while unlikely to happen - if it did would have extended seventy feet beyond the panel at an energy level that would have killed anyone wearing even the highest level of PPE. The scary thing was that this was on a 208V three phase. By the way when we got to the bottom of this the contractor had installed a fuse/breaker combination that was non compliant to he electrical code.

We had to change breakers, fuses and panels to correct this - sfterwards the arc flash hazard was negligable.

The long explanation is that this type of analysis requires you collect a lot of data which can even mean talking to equipment manufacturers, requires a complete understanding of the complete electrical installation up to and including information of the supply transformers - which we had to get from the Hydro company, a lot of detailed mathematical analysis etc. This is not something you do when you are looking at a panel - that is why there is supposed to be an Arc Flash label on each panel.

The master electrician from our electrical contractor who had done the work was shocked (pun intended by the results) and to this day he still does not understand what he did wrong after the engineers has attempted to walk him through everything multiple times. This is a very experienced and capable master electrician who does excellent work but crossed over into the engineering domain.

Here in Canada only a Professional Engineer with the appropriate experience etc. may perform this work.
 
HOLY CRAP! I thought it was just going to be a bright flash.

Like Derek, I wish they had gone into what causes it and how to prevent it though.
 
in response to the question what causes an "arc flash" I copied this explanation in from another source.

An arc faults happens when electric current flows through air gaps between conductors. An arc flash can be caused by the following common causes and this is not an exhaustive list:

a) insulation failure in equipment (switch gear electrical distribution equipment etc.),

b) dust, moisture, other contamination,

c) people working on live equipment they incorrectly think has been de-energised,

d) people disconnecting electrical equipment without isolating the circuit,

e) loose connections that overheat, reach thermal runaway and fail

f) accidents caused by touching a test probe to the wrong surface or slipped tool while working on live equipment during fault finding

The fault current magnetic fields make conductors to separate producing an arc. In other words, arc flash is caused by uncontrolled conduction of electrical current from phase to ground, phase to neutral, and/or phase to phase accompanied by ionization of the surrounding air. Because of the expansive vaporization of conductive metal, a line-to-line or line-to-ground arcing fault can escalate into a three phase arcing fault in less than a 1/1000 of a second. The heat energy and intense light at the point of the arc is called arc flash.

Short circuits and arc faults are extremely dangerous and potentially fatal to personnel. The product of arc fault current and voltage concentrated in one place, results in enormous energy released in several forms including, heat, light, sound and pressure. Arc fault generates large amounts of heat that can severely burn human skin and set clothing on fire. Temperatures at the arc can reach four times the temperature of the sun's surface. The high arc temperature vaporizes the conductors in an explosive change in state from solid to vapor. Copper vapor expands to 67,000 times the volume of solid copper. Conductive vapors help sustain the arc and the duration of the arc is primarily determined by the time it takes for overcurrent protective devices to open the circuit. For example, fast acting fuses may open the circuit in 8 ms or faster while other devices may take much longer to operate and open. Metal is blasted and splattered from the fault location. The arcing faults also produce large shock waves that can blow personnel off their feet. The other exposure risks to arcing faults include flying debris, severe sound waves, shock hazard due to touching energized conductors etc.

No two arc flash hazard levels are the same but a system for categorising the level of hazard exists and this is the information provided on the arc flash warning label which should provide the following information:

- Flash Protection Boundary
- Incident energy at 18” expressed in cal/cm2
- PPE required
- Voltage shock hazard
- Limited shock approach boundary
- Restricted shock approach boundary
- Prohibited shock approach boundary

If you do not know what these mean then you must receive the appropriate training before you are working on this equipment. If you are working with this type of equipment then you must request the training and PPE if you are an owner or supervisor you must ensure your workers receive the training and the PPE.
 
NFPA 70E is used for the calculations. UNDER NO CONDITIONS am I recommending untrained persons perform electric work.
 
the NFPA provides one method for performing the calculations but and it is a big but this approach is not valid for all cases - the challange is knowing when it applies and when it does not. There are three other analysis methods defined in IEEE 1584a Guide to Performing Arc Flash Hazard Analysis, these methods include: the "Empiracaly Derived Model, the Fuse equations and the LV Circuit Breaker Equations. Again the engineer has to assess which approach is suitable for each application and even within the same facility you may have to use more than one analytical approach.

There are numerous on-line calculators available where you can go to a website and plug in numbers and get an answer - interesting to see how the arc flash hazard changes as you change current, voltage and breaker response times but this is not the same as doing an arc flash analysis and the web sites make this clear. You can also find a number of vendors who offer professional analysis software used by engineers who do this analysis - not cheap and this software is not intended to replace the knowledgable and experienced engineer it is a tool to assist them. when the engineer uses these software tools they are still accountable for the results it is a requirement of the licencing bodies - at least in canada - that an engineer has satisfied themselves re the accuracy of the results provided by any analysis software before they rely on the results i.e. you can't blame the software if the answer is wrong.
 
Just for giggles, here is an Arc Flash from when a power plant opens its disconnects from the grid.
YouTube - Jacob's Ladder: 500kV Switch Opening
List for the "WOOO!" at the end.

Enjoy!

PS: If any one can tell me how to embed the Youtube video file, let me know and I will embed it.

That is not the normal operation. You do not open those switches without stopping the current flow with a circuit breaker or other interrupter first. In this case the interrupter on that phase failed, so when the switch opened (it's motor operated) there was still current flowing. The arc continued upwards until it contacted the transmission line overhead and other protective relaying opened the downstream (or upstream) circuit breaker.
 
That is not the normal operation. You do not open those switches without stopping the current flow with a circuit breaker or other interrupter first. In this case the interrupter on that phase failed, so when the switch opened (it's motor operated) there was still current flowing. The arc continued upwards until it contacted the transmission line overhead and other protective relaying opened the downstream (or upstream) circuit breaker.

Actiually, in the case of installing GE distribution equipment, that is a normal test of the emergency disconnect - most US customers routinely test there Emer Disc in that fashion (FPL, Duke, KGen, Dominion, Edison power to name a few). It is the only way to isolate that particular design plant from the 500KV lines and from back feed. I should mention that the particular plant in the link is a gas turbine combined cylce plant in the Nevada desert. The dry air makes an ideal situation for local field ionization releasing Jaacob's ladder when the disconnects open. I work for the engineering side of GE Energy.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back