It could likely be a TTI. It seems to me the TTI's physically ran larger than the LMI's.
M mstaylor Well-Known Member Departed Member Sep 10, 2010 #21 It could likely be a TTI. It seems to me the TTI's physically ran larger than the LMI's.
J jstandfast Active Member Sep 10, 2010 #22 mstaylor said: It could likely be a TTI. It seems to me the TTI's physically ran larger than the LMI's. Click to expand... My bet would be LMI. The TTI product (7.2s if memory serves ) was a much more rectangular affair,and blue to boot. And it looks like an LMI frame.
mstaylor said: It could likely be a TTI. It seems to me the TTI's physically ran larger than the LMI's. Click to expand... My bet would be LMI. The TTI product (7.2s if memory serves ) was a much more rectangular affair,and blue to boot. And it looks like an LMI frame.
STEVETERRY Well-Known Member Sep 10, 2010 #23 derekleffew said: 6. Mr. Terry will likely know conclusively, but I'm betting: Lighting Methods Inc., circa 1982. Click to expand... That would be my exact guess. ST
derekleffew said: 6. Mr. Terry will likely know conclusively, but I'm betting: Lighting Methods Inc., circa 1982. Click to expand... That would be my exact guess. ST
M mstaylor Well-Known Member Departed Member Sep 12, 2010 #24 I did a show yesterday that used all LMI racks and an old Avolite board, all analog. It was fun to do an old school show, they had zero DMX toys.
I did a show yesterday that used all LMI racks and an old Avolite board, all analog. It was fun to do an old school show, they had zero DMX toys.