de27192
Active Member
Hi All... sorry I have been quiet lately
I have an interesting question which has cropped up in conversation recently and would be interested to hear others' experiences in how to approach this.
How have you dealt with introducing PPE / 'clipping on' / rescue systems + plans / etc into a workplace where existing systems have been slacker... without coming across as the dreaded 'health and safety nazi'. I'm sure we all agree that there are many scenarios where adding such systems to a working practice can make it more tiresome and more bother than it were without. Does anyone have any tips for introducing and positively encouraging the use of such systems to a workforce who are very much used to and happy with the system as is... without coming across an over-zealous perfectionist who wants to write a risk assessment for your morning shave and everything upwards of that.
Examples could include cat ladders with no hoops / inertia reel / track system / etc which, if fallen from, could clearly cause serious injury. How do you encourage people who have happily climbed these, minus fall prevention, for several years - that it would be better to use fall protection equipment. Or lighting bridges with open fronts, where a moment off balance could clearly put you over the front, yet again people have managed several years of safe usage without even a near miss. These are situations where I have absolutely no difficulty in justifying the legal and moral requirement to do so... they are places where accidents could both (A) obviously happen; and (B) obviously be prevented; but do have difficulty justifying the actual real need for, to people who have happily used the equipment without incident for a noteworthy period.
Before the obvious answers come flooding in... for the sake of this question; the equipment can be provided no issue; and designed into the working situations by an experienced W@H / Rescue professional. The obligatory requirement to use the equipment can be written into working regulations and that is all very well. However on the basis that (A) people cannot be supervised all the time, (B) people can often be very set in their ways, and (C) the use of such equipment may plausibly mean that some routine tasks can become more effort than people have been used to - without incident; I am interested to know how people have succeeded in positively encouraging their workforce to adopt these practices, and enthused those people towards the benefits of using it; without causing themselves unpopularity in the process.
It is one thing when an external representative comes into a workplace and says "you must do this, this and this". With such people you can berate them and call them names til the cows come home once they've left the building. But when the person trying to introduce the system of work into an existing environment has to live and work as part of the team, with other roles therein, it is much more important to earn respect and appreciation for your efforts, than have them considered an inconvenience.
I am sure there will be forum members here who have experienced this kind of scenario and I am very interested to hear from anyone in that boat. It's all very well running in and shouting regulations, but in scenarios where people have become used to an existing way of working, I feel it is far more constructive to get those people positively enthused about adopting new and safer practices, than doing them simply because they're told to; as well as helping people see that doing otherwise is not simply a case of pulling a naughty when nobody's looking, but it is actually posing a genuine and plausible risk to life that we should all be enthused about preserving.
I have an interesting question which has cropped up in conversation recently and would be interested to hear others' experiences in how to approach this.
How have you dealt with introducing PPE / 'clipping on' / rescue systems + plans / etc into a workplace where existing systems have been slacker... without coming across as the dreaded 'health and safety nazi'. I'm sure we all agree that there are many scenarios where adding such systems to a working practice can make it more tiresome and more bother than it were without. Does anyone have any tips for introducing and positively encouraging the use of such systems to a workforce who are very much used to and happy with the system as is... without coming across an over-zealous perfectionist who wants to write a risk assessment for your morning shave and everything upwards of that.
Examples could include cat ladders with no hoops / inertia reel / track system / etc which, if fallen from, could clearly cause serious injury. How do you encourage people who have happily climbed these, minus fall prevention, for several years - that it would be better to use fall protection equipment. Or lighting bridges with open fronts, where a moment off balance could clearly put you over the front, yet again people have managed several years of safe usage without even a near miss. These are situations where I have absolutely no difficulty in justifying the legal and moral requirement to do so... they are places where accidents could both (A) obviously happen; and (B) obviously be prevented; but do have difficulty justifying the actual real need for, to people who have happily used the equipment without incident for a noteworthy period.
Before the obvious answers come flooding in... for the sake of this question; the equipment can be provided no issue; and designed into the working situations by an experienced W@H / Rescue professional. The obligatory requirement to use the equipment can be written into working regulations and that is all very well. However on the basis that (A) people cannot be supervised all the time, (B) people can often be very set in their ways, and (C) the use of such equipment may plausibly mean that some routine tasks can become more effort than people have been used to - without incident; I am interested to know how people have succeeded in positively encouraging their workforce to adopt these practices, and enthused those people towards the benefits of using it; without causing themselves unpopularity in the process.
It is one thing when an external representative comes into a workplace and says "you must do this, this and this". With such people you can berate them and call them names til the cows come home once they've left the building. But when the person trying to introduce the system of work into an existing environment has to live and work as part of the team, with other roles therein, it is much more important to earn respect and appreciation for your efforts, than have them considered an inconvenience.
I am sure there will be forum members here who have experienced this kind of scenario and I am very interested to hear from anyone in that boat. It's all very well running in and shouting regulations, but in scenarios where people have become used to an existing way of working, I feel it is far more constructive to get those people positively enthused about adopting new and safer practices, than doing them simply because they're told to; as well as helping people see that doing otherwise is not simply a case of pulling a naughty when nobody's looking, but it is actually posing a genuine and plausible risk to life that we should all be enthused about preserving.