Bubby4j
Active Member
I work in my church's sound booth, for the youth band.
I was thinking, "It's too bad we don't have wireless personal monitors! They're so expensive!". But then I realized, what is a smartphone but a computer which has a audio output for headphones and can connect to multiple MP3 TCP/IP streams over WiFi?
They seem to me like they'd be the perfect wireless monitor! Already paid for! The only thing you'd need is some kind of device (computer?) which has a bunch of audio inputs that can broadcast them over wifi in multiple MP3 streams. Each person could customize their mix with an app on their phone. You could even have the computer do the heavy lifting combining all the streams, just have the phone tell the computer what it wants in their mix.
Seems like this could be fairly cheaply done, is there already something like this? I've tried googling but haven't been able to find much about it.
256kbps MP3 steam * 6 band members = 1.5mbps total bandwidth. Easily achievable by any good wireless router.
Sure, there'd be latency, but it wouldn't really be that much. 20ms?
I was thinking, "It's too bad we don't have wireless personal monitors! They're so expensive!". But then I realized, what is a smartphone but a computer which has a audio output for headphones and can connect to multiple MP3 TCP/IP streams over WiFi?
They seem to me like they'd be the perfect wireless monitor! Already paid for! The only thing you'd need is some kind of device (computer?) which has a bunch of audio inputs that can broadcast them over wifi in multiple MP3 streams. Each person could customize their mix with an app on their phone. You could even have the computer do the heavy lifting combining all the streams, just have the phone tell the computer what it wants in their mix.
Seems like this could be fairly cheaply done, is there already something like this? I've tried googling but haven't been able to find much about it.
256kbps MP3 steam * 6 band members = 1.5mbps total bandwidth. Easily achievable by any good wireless router.
Sure, there'd be latency, but it wouldn't really be that much. 20ms?