Need vs. expandability was my
point here.
If you have no money but can afford an old
standby 'traditional'
desk go for it. Used/New, get what makes sense and what you can afford.
The idea of purchasing a highly expandable
desk is totally worthless if they won't actually use its features. Think about what they really NEED not necessarily expandability.
If they will actually, in the next 3 to 5 years, buy a bunch of new equipment that necessitates the more modern
desk, then get the more modern
desk. Otherwise, don't buy a Mercedes when all you need is a Honda.
e
I don't think that your analogy to cars is accurate. No one NEEDS a Mercedes. The analogy is more like: do you buy an '84 Corolla or an '08? If you are going for bang for your buck, buying the new car is a much better deal. You get warranty coverage, you know that you are the first owner, you are going to get features like
power windows & doors, a CD player,
etc. Sure, you might nit ever use that fancy CD player, but just in case, it is there.
It doesn't matter if you are ever going to use all the features of one of the new generation consoles, there is just no sense in A) buying used gear that you have no idea how well it will function next year and has no warranty, and B) buying old technology.
You wouldn't go into a computer store today and buy a computer that runs Windows 95 just because it is cheaper. Sure, you can get on the internet with it, run office, print, email, and everything you might need to do, but that doesn't make it the best choice for you.
It doesn't matter if 90% of the time the only thing that the
desk gets used for is a music teacher turning a
submaster up for the concert. Almost any
desk can do that. It is the other 10% of the time that matters. Students are going to be coming in more and more tech savvy as times goes on. In my opinion, it is worth it to have the ability to let the kids who are interested and dedicated to have the ability to learn on industry standard equipment. You don't need to have a single moving light or
color scroller to make it worth buying an
Ion or a
Palette. Just because the
desk has that functionality and you aren't using it doesn't mean that it is too advanced. It means that at some
point some kid is going to
walk in and say: "Hey, we could do XYZ" and then it will get used, and that student may become the next hot Broadway designer. Whereas if you install something that is years behind, and a royal PITA to operate you may turn that student off from progressing in the field.
The other major thing is that you want to own a
desk that there is real support for. Sure,
ETC will still fix your Microvision, but it isn't like you can just get a new motherboard for it, it has to all be built. It is even getting harder to find a floppy drive if you ever had to replace the one on your
Express. With this new generation of consoles, spare/replacement parts will be on
hand, software bugs will be able to be worked out,
etc. Supporting a new
console is going to be easier and more cost effective than supporting an old one.
I can't think of any argument for buying into outdated technology. The only guarantee that you will get with buying an outdated
desk is that you will have to replace it sooner than you want to. From the cost analysis standpoint that makes little sense to do. Why buy a cheap fix now, when in 3-5 years you will need to buy something else. It is much more logical to buy a
console that will last you 10+ years, that doesn't even cost double what the outdated one does.