I posted this on the ETC Element forum, but since that forum doesn't get a whole lot of traffic I thought I'd ask here too.
We opened last night, and I discovered that some of the actors had not been wearing their proper make-up, so I had to alter some levels at home after the show. I did this on the offline client.
I e-mailed the new file to my op, he popped it up on his offline client and added some cue labels, saved his version separate from the one I sent him, and took it to the show.
He loads the show on the board and runs the show, I arrive from another tech in the middle of the second act. just in time to watch every single channel go to 75%, house lights, all specials, everything. A quick look at the board shows that indeed, the board is telling the dimmers to do so.
a quick look at blind shows that these levels tracked all the way through the last cue in the next dance number, which was blocked. I proceeded to kick off my op, sneak everything except the front wash out and attempt to re-create the dance cues on the fly.
a post-mortem look at the show files, show that:
1) The file I sent him does not contain those levels
2) The file on his thumb drive, that he added labels to, does not contain those levels.
3) The show file in the board is the only place these levels show up.
Now my first thought is, of course, operator error. but that doesn't quite wash here because
a) a change like that, either in live or blind, requires hitting multiple buttons.
b) you have to be looking at the cue to make those changes.
c) If you had seen that happen, you could always just reload the old show file (which my board op is perfectly capable of doing) or just undo.
d) there are no labels on that cue. nor are there any numbers in any of the labels near that cue (not that it would matter with the virtual keyboard.)
Is there some gremlin that could have caused this? If this happens again, could I reload a show file mid-playback without going back to the beginning of the cue list (with the possibility of a blackout)?
I know I'm giving my op the benefit of the doubt, but he's not a moron. Has anybody else had something like this happen?
We opened last night, and I discovered that some of the actors had not been wearing their proper make-up, so I had to alter some levels at home after the show. I did this on the offline client.
I e-mailed the new file to my op, he popped it up on his offline client and added some cue labels, saved his version separate from the one I sent him, and took it to the show.
He loads the show on the board and runs the show, I arrive from another tech in the middle of the second act. just in time to watch every single channel go to 75%, house lights, all specials, everything. A quick look at the board shows that indeed, the board is telling the dimmers to do so.
a quick look at blind shows that these levels tracked all the way through the last cue in the next dance number, which was blocked. I proceeded to kick off my op, sneak everything except the front wash out and attempt to re-create the dance cues on the fly.
a post-mortem look at the show files, show that:
1) The file I sent him does not contain those levels
2) The file on his thumb drive, that he added labels to, does not contain those levels.
3) The show file in the board is the only place these levels show up.
Now my first thought is, of course, operator error. but that doesn't quite wash here because
a) a change like that, either in live or blind, requires hitting multiple buttons.
b) you have to be looking at the cue to make those changes.
c) If you had seen that happen, you could always just reload the old show file (which my board op is perfectly capable of doing) or just undo.
d) there are no labels on that cue. nor are there any numbers in any of the labels near that cue (not that it would matter with the virtual keyboard.)
Is there some gremlin that could have caused this? If this happens again, could I reload a show file mid-playback without going back to the beginning of the cue list (with the possibility of a blackout)?
I know I'm giving my op the benefit of the doubt, but he's not a moron. Has anybody else had something like this happen?
Last edited: