The above Ad will no longer appear after you Sign Up for Free!

Intercoms

Discussion in 'Stage Management and Facility Operations' started by Tyler, Jan 3, 2007.

  1. Tyler

    Tyler Member

    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    7
    Location:
    000000000000
    0000000000000000000000000
     
    Last edited: Nov 9, 2009
  2. Footer

    Footer Senior Team Senior Team Premium Member

    Messages:
    9,435
    Likes Received:
    1,833
    Location:
    Saratoga Springs, NY
  3. Van

    Van CBMod CB Mods Premium Member

    Messages:
    5,830
    Likes Received:
    1,135
    Occupation:
    Project Manager, Stagecraft Industries, Inc.
    Location:
    Portland, Or.
    I second, third, and fourth ! PI is the way to go. Use the search tool on here for the word intercom. You will find several discussions where many of us have extolled the virtues of PI.
     
  4. gafftaper

    gafftaper Senior Team Senior Team Fight Leukemia

    Messages:
    12,568
    Likes Received:
    2,575
    Occupation:
    Theater Manager & T.D.
    Location:
    Seattle, Washington
    I was really impressed with the products from Eartec at LDI. Unfortunately, I haven't found anyone who owns the products yet to give me a first hand account of how they work in the real world. But they have a 4 person wireless full duplex system for $800 (including belt packs and headsets no base station needed). You can't beat that. For About $550 you can add an interface that allows the wireless system to talk IN FULL DUPLEX with a wired system.

    http://www.eartec.com/td904pro.html
     
  5. Footer

    Footer Senior Team Senior Team Premium Member

    Messages:
    9,435
    Likes Received:
    1,833
    Location:
    Saratoga Springs, NY
    I have used those, they are OK until you use them for more then two hours and a ton of static starts appearing on the line. My personal rule with com, go wired unless you MUST be wireless. Also, wireless com is really only useful if all people can talk to everyone at the same time, and the master/slave thing is a bit annoying.
     
    Last edited: Jan 3, 2007
  6. soundlight

    soundlight Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,664
    Likes Received:
    329
    Location:
    PA & NJ
    The only thing that I don't like about the Eartec wireless is the required Master Pack, which is basically the beltpack that has to be on and in range of all of the others for the system to work.

    I'd look in to Eartec's wired system as well, but make sure that you get PTT (Push To Talk) Headsets, because there are no beltpacks in the system.

    http://eartec.com/dramacom.html
     
  7. mbenonis

    mbenonis Wireless Guy Administrator

    Messages:
    1,432
    Likes Received:
    150
    Occupation:
    Radio Engineer
    Location:
    Washington, DC
    If you go with wireless comm, remember that you'll need (2*N) frequencies to operate these units, which may be a problem if you're located near a major metropolitan area (N is the number if units you have). Additionally, these frequencies will likely need to be coordinated with any other wireless devices you have, such as microphones.

    BTW, I'll also throw my two cents in the hat for PI systems. Definitely the way to go if you're on a budget and still want bulletproof equipment.
     
  8. Andy_Leviss

    Andy_Leviss Active Member Premium Member

    Messages:
    473
    Likes Received:
    19
    Location:
    NYC
    Actually, you only need N+1 frequencies. Just like a wired com system, the base station transmits a party-line, so, given a four-beltpack system, you have (at the base station) four receive frequencies (one for each beltpack), which the base station mixes together into the party line and sends out on the transmit frequency. Just as with wired beltpacks, each beltpack uses sidetone nulling to avoid feeding back from receiving its own signal back on the party-line.

    To put it another way, I'll use the HME System 800 as an example. They come in A, B, and C frequency sets. On an A system, the base station is A, and the four beltpacks on that station are A1, A2, A3, and A4. Each beltpack receives the A signal from the base station, and transmits its own signal (1, 2, 3, or 4) back to the base station (which mixes those signals together to form the A).

    All that said, I do need to echo the previous posts that if you don't have a very, very specific reason for going wireless--especially in a travelling situation--stick with wired. Cheaper, lower maintenance, and no worries of RF issues.
     
    Last edited: Jan 16, 2007
  9. GeneralDoom

    GeneralDoom Member

    Messages:
    28
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Lafayette, LA
    The other big advatage to a wired system is it is much easier to expand and/or replace damaged componates
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice