The Sennheiser WSM also allows you to see and change the receiver labeling, monitor audio and RF levels and monitor mute status and battery life (with warnings for things like low battery life). You could also remotely change frequencies if necessary, say if some new interfering source or IM was experienced in the midst of a production. Unless the receivers can easily be directly monitored and accessed by the operator, then this type of functionality can be a real benefit when running larger systems.In terms of the networking ability in the 100 vs 300, wouldn't the IAS software we have take care of printing multiple coordinations for each band? It may limit our ability to actually SEE the RF activity, but as long as we know what frequencies to use in our area via the printout, we could just try channels until we find the ones that are compatible?
Good idea. However, I don't feel safe only having two bands to work with... and my fears were confirmed. According to IAS, there are only 9 frequencies available in the C band and 8 in the D band. This is not accounting for spacing required to prevent intermod... Not to mention, Sennheiser and Shure are more widely accepted in large-scale setups like this.For yucks and giggles, I priced out a 24 unit Audio Technica 4000 series system with 12 receivers in the C band and 12 in the D band along with 3 antenna distribution systems per band.
Without mics, you'd be looking at about $ 18,800.00
This sounds like an amazing thing to have... However, I just really don't think we can swing for it. I'll have to bring the idea up to the Board and see if they are willing to authorize an addition $10 grand, which is unlikely.The Sennheiser WSM also allows you to see and change the receiver labeling, monitor audio and RF levels and monitor mute status and battery life (with warnings for things like low battery life). You could also remotely change frequencies if necessary, say if some new interfering source or IM was experienced in the midst of a production. Unless the receivers can easily be directly monitored and accessed by the operator, then this type of functionality can be a real benefit when running larger systems.
Lectrosonics is by far the best way to go if you're going to be starting with something like 12 channels and building on it. Their VRM series reciever chasis can be stacked and daisy chained, significantly reducing the ammount of outboard gear you would need to purchase for RF distribution.Actually, I just got off the phone with the Artistic Director. He said that they could also do the shows with smaller casting first, and work up to high cast shows this season. That way, we could order a smaller number of more expensive units upfront, and then build the system as each show progresses. Apparently, it not that they don't want to spend the money for the more expensive units; only that they don't have it to spend until some ticket income starts flowing.
If we can in fact follow this route, then maybe we can go for the higher priced units. Can anyone explain the differences between the 300's and 500's? From reading Sennies specs, they seem exactly the same?
We may even be in the market again for the Lectro's which would be nice; due mainly to the ease of adding additional channels in the future.
PS) I just saw a video of the Sennheiser WSM software. Pretty neat. However, do we need any sort of networking box to run the 300's or 500's in networking mode? In the video, he had the receivers hooked up to a NET1 Frequency Management Network System. Would we need this as well?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.