Re: Lighting Control Future
I can only type [Channel] [1] [Thru] [12] [Focus Palette] [7] [@] [7][5] [Enter] a few ways, and get the same results, because I have a limited number of words to make up my command or sentence.
I can say "Channels one through twelve at focus palette 7, at 75 percent", "Put channels one through 12 on focus palette 7 with an intensity of 75", or even "Select the first electric moving heads, and put them at focus palette 7, with an intensity of 75 percent", and each of those phrases should be able to achieve the same results.
That's a big thing with Nuances technology. Not just translating the audio into something the computer can understand, but also using that to interpret the intention.
In my opinion, something like this would have to be able to interpret things either when said as if you were typing into a command line, or speaking normally. At least to a certain extent.
How is learning a spoken constructed language different than learning typed constructed language?
I can only type [Channel] [1] [Thru] [12] [Focus Palette] [7] [@] [7][5] [Enter] a few ways, and get the same results, because I have a limited number of words to make up my command or sentence.
I can say "Channels one through twelve at focus palette 7, at 75 percent", "Put channels one through 12 on focus palette 7 with an intensity of 75", or even "Select the first electric moving heads, and put them at focus palette 7, with an intensity of 75 percent", and each of those phrases should be able to achieve the same results.
That's a big thing with Nuances technology. Not just translating the audio into something the computer can understand, but also using that to interpret the intention.
In my opinion, something like this would have to be able to interpret things either when said as if you were typing into a command line, or speaking normally. At least to a certain extent.