There's a lot of legacy and anachronism in theatrical terms, which I generally support. In fact, I still like to
call out
RoscoluX gel with an x (x99, x05) to differentiate from
Roscolene. Which is a totally useless practice and just confuses people, but I like the history. Calling a 7.5" x 7.5"
gel a 6" cut (to fit an
instrument with a 6"
lens but 7.5"
gel frame) made some sense before the development of the S4, with a 6.25"
gel frame, that practically holds a 6" piece of
gel. Heck, when I first started using S4s, we labeled the barrels as 6x9, 6x12,
etc. to fit with the
Altman system. Took a while to adopt the
beam angle nomenclature. So I support hanging onto the old
system, even if it does actually confuse matters. We're all just going to have to clarify the standards in every
house.
On a pratical note, I cut gels for S4s at 6" square, because most
gel sheets are 20x24, so I get 12 per instead of 9. And I know I'll get outrage, but when using
Lee Filters which are 21x24, I cut gels for 7.5" frames at 7" for the same reason. The horror!
Now should we talk about 2x4s and 24' trucks?