One is a matter of frequency maybe. Think about working conditions as a way it will be everyday, day in day out, 5, 6 maybe 7 days a week. I actually worked 36 days strait on a film during a 11 month shooting period.
So, I'm a little confused about this part:
Wow, so you don't see a problem working people for 9 1/2 hours(or more) before giving a meal break. People that will be doing hard, dangerous work. What if your lucky enough to get the work for more than a day or two. What about a week. Or two weeks. Where do you draw the
line. If it is just a small job it is OK to push people to great time lengths. Does this Texas Law mean a crew could be worked for 14 hours then given a 1 hour meal break. I MUST be getting that wrong. If you did a schedule like that for multiple days I feel it would get unsafe. I'm very fortunately constantly employed. My Films & TV shows all work over 50hour weeks, usually up to the mid 70 hour
mark.
Am I a primadonna because I want a meal every 6 hours or I get COMPENSATED for it. I don't care if people think so. My CA state law is 5 hours so yes my IA contract GIVES that to the
producer. My contract also has 1 15 minute break each 6 hour
block of work. But in the 20 years I've been working professionally(meaning gigs I pay my bills with, as opposed to the many free shows I do for various charities across the southland every year) I have NEVER ever seen a shooting crew take a 15 minute break. Smokers will pop out for a
smoke, but put out immediately when called. Which I feel get us to the meaning to some of the word professional. If a person chooses to
call them selves a profession because that is technically correct if one is paid, as opposed to the attitude of work, so be it. I'm not one of those. Case in
point, I was a "professional" photographer at the early age of 15. Sold my first of many prints to the local paper. I even took THE picture of Steve Wozniaks' plane crash that went world-wide AP. I still am in love with photography and shoot for some clients. I do not consider myself, nor represent myself as a "professional" photographer only because I do not have the attitude that all the professional photogs I know do. That mainly being the drive to learn the craft to the best of their abilities, not just
point & click. To strive to do the best job possible. I mention all this to help illustrate the issue you mentioned about the union dropping everything at a un-opertune time. I think that sounds like a personality conflict. I always see discussions between departments when rigging as to when to COORDINATE our breaks. Sure, we like to take it maybe at 3 hours into the day, but if we need to work with other departments we talk AND work WITH them. That I feel is being professional. It isn't in our contract WHEN exactly to
call coffee break. See what I mean?
I'm sure glad you're happy where you are, I'm happy where I am. Places are different.
BTW MP's pay was as follows;
$7.50 first 1/2 hour
$10.00 next 1/2 hour
$12.50 every 1/2 hour thereafter until a 30 min break.
Incorporating in CA does incur an annual fee over $500 in pretty sure.
I think the union has improved and protected working conditions, not created ways to 'stick it to the man'. I don't think they are perfect by any stretch. I think if a union member is going to 'act-out' and do the things like
call a break when it clearly hinders the none break taking workers, they are just a person with a bad attitude about something anyway. They would be the type of person I'd wager that in the rest of their daily lives they looking everywhere for a way to scam themselves better or are bad in other ways. It is a greedy behavior trait I think. We can find examples all throughout society, from positions of
power like Governors releasing murderers to the dregs of society preying on innocent victims, like the scum murderers who killed an ELS Lighting employee this week in a robbery in North Hollywood. Luckily, in life not everyone is like that.
I don't see this threads posts so much as a union induced problems, but more as personality conflicts.