What was the basis for your recommendations and what was the basis for what is being provided? Has anyone created a Program or Needs Analysis defining what the systems need to do? Has anyone performed any predictive analysis for the speaker system? Has anyone been coordinating conduit, power, structural loading, access, equipment space, etc.? Or is the idea to just throw equipment at it and hope it works? For example, an iLive is a nice console, but does it matter what you have if you don't have the connectivity needed at the stage? The process should be that what you need it to do drives the equipment choices and not equipment selected in a vacuum driving what the venue can do.What my recommendation was to get 2 QSC ILA (installed line arrays) they come with 2 18" subs at the top and 4 3-way speakers, I was going to get 2 of those on either side of the stage. I was also going to tell them to get 6 KW series speakers and 2 dual 18" subs for the front fill, they would be put on the stage deck with the KWs stacked on the sub and then in an arc form so there was no gap of the sound after the tuning... seeing as they just got the bid, that is no longer going to happen and we are probably going to end up with 4 15" speakers hung from the roof with nothing else. I pray that the console was not included, I was going to say we should get an iLive system from allen and heath... its digital, which is what they want, and it is easy to use and, for a digital mixing console, pretty cheap. Ill let you know as soon as I do.
I am very curious as to the logic behind your concept for the speaker system. How did you decide that a nominal 140 degree horizontal pattern was appropriate? How did you determine that two subs and four main boxes per side was appropriate? I'm not sure which KW speakers you were considering but how did you see six 60-75 degree axissymmetric mains sitting on two subs on the stage deck providing appropriate front fill coverage and not affecting sight lines? Did you have any performance goals for the system and do anything to confirm they would be met or did you just pick equipment you liked and assume it would work?
Sorry if this sounds dismissive but the whole situation seems a bit like ones I've encountered before where users get so focused on products and details that no one can get the 'big picture' information that is actually required to design and bid the project, so they end up having to ignore the users. Don't lose sight that the primary intent for a new performing arts facility is usually to create a functional and effective facility and doing that involves much more than simply incorporating personal product preferences.
Last edited: